Regulations

+ Show component code

@supports(display: grid) {
    :root {
        --sidebar-width-on-desktop: calc((var(--base-font-size) * (14 / 15)) * 19);
        --body-width-on-desktop: 45.75rem;
    }
    @media only screen and (min-width: 769px) {
        #side-bar .close-menu {
            display: block;
            position: fixed;
            top: 0.5rem;
            left: 0.5rem;
            width: 3rem;
            height: 3rem;
            background: unset;
            opacity: 1;
            pointer-events: all;
            z-index: -1;
        }
 
        #side-bar .close-menu img {
            color: transparent;
        }
 
        #side-bar .close-menu::before,
        #side-bar .close-menu::after {
            content: "";
            box-sizing: border-box;
            position: fixed;
            display: block;
            top: 0.5rem;
            left: 0.5rem;
            width: 3rem;
            height: 3rem;
            padding: 0;
            margin: 0;
            text-align: center;
            pointer-events: all;
            cursor: pointer;
            transition:
                opacity var(--sidebar-transition-timing);
        }
 
        #side-bar .close-menu::before {
            --mask:url("data:image/svg+xml,%3C%3Fxml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'%3F%3E%3Csvg xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg' xmlns:xlink='http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink' id='Hamburger' x='0' y='0' baseProfile='tiny' overflow='visible' version='1.2' viewBox='0 0 32 32' xml:space='preserve'%3E%3Cpath d='M4 10h24c1.1 0 2-.9 2-2s-.9-2-2-2H4c-1.1 0-2 .9-2 2s.9 2 2 2zm24 4H4c-1.1 0-2 .9-2 2s.9 2 2 2h24c1.1 0 2-.9 2-2s-.9-2-2-2zm0 8H4c-1.1 0-2 .9-2 2s.9 2 2 2h24c1.1 0 2-.9 2-2s-.9-2-2-2z'/%3E%3C/svg%3E");
            z-index: -1;
            background-color: var(--toggle-icon-color, rgb(var(--sidebar-links-text))) !important;
            -webkit-mask: var(--mask);
            mask: var(--mask);
            -webkit-mask-repeat: no-repeat;
            mask-repeat: no-repeat;
            -webkit-mask-position: 50% 50%;
            mask-position: 50% 50%;
            -webkit-mask-size: 60%;
            mask-size: 60%;
        }
 
        #side-bar .close-menu::after {
            z-index: -2;
            background-color: var(--toggle-button-bg, rgb(var(--sidebar-bg-color))) !important;
            border-radius: var(--toggle-roundness, 50%);
            border: var(--toggle-border-color, rgb(var(--sidebar-links-text))) var(--toggle-border-width, 0.25rem) solid;
        }
 
        #side-bar:focus-within .close-menu,
        #side-bar:not(:has(.close-menu:hover)):not(:focus-within):hover .close-menu {
            pointer-events: none;
        }
 
        #side-bar:focus-within .close-menu::before,
        #side-bar:focus-within .close-menu::after {
            opacity: 0;
            pointer-events: none;
        }
 
        #side-bar:not(:has(.close-menu:hover)):not(:focus-within):hover .close-menu::before,
        #side-bar:not(:has(.close-menu:hover)):not(:focus-within):hover .close-menu::after {
            opacity: 0;
            pointer-events: none;
        }
 
        #side-bar {
            display: block;
            position: fixed;
            top: 0;
            left: calc(var(--sidebar-width-on-desktop)*-1);
            z-index: 10;
            transition:
                left 500ms cubic-bezier(0.4, 0, 0.2, 1) 100ms;
            height: 100%;
            overflow-y: auto;
            overflow-x: hidden;
            margin-top: 0;
        }
 
        #side-bar:focus-within {
            left: 0;
        }
 
        #side-bar:not(:has(.close-menu:hover)):not(:focus-within):hover {
            left: 0;
        }
 
        #side-bar .side-block {
            margin-top: 1rem;
            background-color: rgb(0, 0, 0, 0);
            border-radius: 0;
            border-left-width: 0px;
            border-right-width: 0px;
        }
 
        #main-content::before {
            content: "";
            display: block;
            position: fixed;
            top: 0;
            right: 0;
            z-index: -1;
            opacity: 0;
            transition:
                opacity 500ms cubic-bezier(0.4, 0, 0.2, 1) 100ms,
                width 500ms cubic-bezier(0.4, 0, 0.2, 1) 100ms;
            margin-left: var(--sidebar-width-on-desktop);
            background: rgba(var(--swatch-menubg-black-color), .3) 1px 1px repeat;
            padding-right: 0;
            width: 100%;
            height: 100vh;
            pointer-events: none;
            z-index: 99;
        }
 
        #side-bar:focus-within ~ #main-content::before {
            width: calc(100% - var(--sidebar-width-on-desktop));
            opacity: 1;
            pointer-events: all;
        }
 
        #side-bar:not(:has(.close-menu:hover)):not(:focus-within):hover ~ #main-content::before {
            width: calc(100% - var(--sidebar-width-on-desktop));
            opacity: 1;
            pointer-events: all;
        }
 
        @supports (-moz-appearance:none) and (background-attachment:local) and (not (-moz-osx-font-smoothing:auto)) { #side-bar {
            padding: inherit;
        } }
 
        #content-wrap {
            display: flex;
            flex-direction: row;
            width: calc(100vw - (100vw - 100%));
            min-height: calc(100vh - calc(var(--final-header-height-on-desktop, 10.125rem)));
            flex-grow: 2;
            height: auto;
            position: relative;
            margin: 0 auto;
            max-width: inherit;
        }
 
        #main-content {
            width: 100%;
            position: initial;
            max-height: 100%;
            padding: 2rem 1rem;
            max-width: var(--body-width-on-desktop, 45.75rem);
            margin: 0 auto;
        }
 
        #page-content {
            max-width: min(90vw, var(--body-width-on-desktop, 45.75rem));
        }
 
        @supports (-webkit-hyphens:none) { 
            #side-bar {
                transition:
                    left 500ms cubic-bezier(0.4, 0, 0.2, 1) 100ms,
                    padding-right 500ms cubic-bezier(0.4, 0, 0.2, 1) 100ms,
                    background-color 500ms cubic-bezier(0.4, 0, 0.2, 1) 100ms;
                padding-right: 0;
                background-color: rgb(0, 0, 0, 0);
                pointer-events: all;
                overflow-x: visible;
                overflow-y: visible;
                z-index: 999;
            }
 
            #side-bar::-webkit-scrollbar {
                opacity: 0;
                -webkit-transition: opacity 500ms cubic-bezier(0.4, 0, 0.2, 1) 100ms;
                transition: opacity 500ms cubic-bezier(0.4, 0, 0.2, 1) 100ms;
            }
 
            #side-bar .close-menu::before {
                z-index: 999;
            }
 
            #side-bar .close-menu::after {
                z-index: 998;
            }
 
            #side-bar:hover .close-menu::before,
            #side-bar:hover .close-menu::after {
                opacity: 0;
            }
 
            #side-bar:hover {
                left: 0;
                background-color: rgba(var(--swatch-menubg-color), 1);
                padding-right: 0;
            }
 
            #side-bar:hover::-webkit-scrollbar {
                opacity: 1;
            }
 
            #side-bar:hover~#main-content::before {
                width: calc(100% - var(--sidebar-width-on-desktop));
                opacity: 1;
                pointer-events: all;
            }
        }
    }
}

---

+ Show component code

:root {
        /* header measurements */
        --header-height-on-desktop: 10rem;
        --header-height-on-mobile: 10rem;
        --header-h1-font-size: clamp(2rem, 5vw, 2.8125rem);
        --header-h2-font-size: clamp(0.875rem, 3vw, 0.9375rem);
 
        --logo-image: url("https://nu-scptheme.github.io/Black-Highlighter/img/logo.svg");
    }
 
    #header {
        --search-textbox-text-color: var(--swatch-secondary-color);
        background: none;
    }
 
    #header::before {
        content: " ";
        position: absolute;
        width: 100%;
        height: 100%;
        left: 0;
        top: 0.75rem;
        background-image: var(--logo-image);
        background-repeat: no-repeat;
        background-position: center 0;
        background-size: auto calc(var(--header-height-on-desktop) - 1.5rem);
        opacity: 0.8;
        pointer-events: none;
    }
 
    #header h1,
    #header h2 {
        margin: 0;
        padding: 0;
        width: 100%;
        height: var(--header-height-on-desktop);
        display: flex;
        align-items: center;
        justify-content: center;
        display: flex;
        align-items: center;
        justify-content: center;
    }
 
    #header h1 a,
    #header h1 a::before,
    #header h2 span,
    #header h2 span::before {
        margin: 0;
        padding: 0;
        z-index: 0;
        display: block;
        text-align: center;
    }
 
    #header h1 {
        z-index: 1;
    }
 
    #header h1 a::before,
    #header h1 a::after {
        content: var(--header-title);
    }
 
    #header h1 a::before  {
        color: rgb(var(--swatch-text-tertiary-color));
        z-index: -1;
        -webkit-text-stroke: 0.325rem rgb(var(--swatch-text-dark));
    }
 
    #header h1 a::after {
        color: rgb(var(--swatch-headerh1-color));
        z-index: 1;
    }
 
    #header h2 {
        z-index: 0;
        text-transform: uppercase;
        pointer-events: none;
    }
 
    #header h2 span {
        margin-top: calc(var(--header-height-on-mobile)/2 + var(--header-h1-font-size)/2 - 2em);
    }
 
    #header h2 span::before,
    #header h2 span::after {
        --wght: 600;
        content: var(--header-subtitle);
        position: absolute;
        left: 50%;
        transform: translateY(-50%) translateX(-50%);
        width: 100%;
        text-align: center;
    }
 
    #header h2 span::before {
        -webkit-text-stroke: 0.25rem rgb(var(--swatch-text-dark));
    }
 
    #header h2 span::after {
        color: rgb(var(--swatch-headerh2-color));
        z-index: 1;
    }
 
    #search-top-box form[id="search-top-box-form"]:not(:focus-within) input[type="text"] {
        color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0);
    }
 
    @media (min-width: 36rem) {
 
        #login-status {
            flex-grow: 1;
            left: 3%;
            right: initial;
        }
 
         #login-status::before {
            --mask-image: none;
            background-color: transparent;
        }
 
        #login-status:not(:focus-within) {
            color: rgb(var(--login-line-divider-color));
            -webkit-user-select: initial;
            -moz-user-select: initial;
            -ms-user-select: initial;
            user-select: initial;
        }
 
        #login-status #account-topbutton,
        #login-status:not(:focus-within) #account-topbutton {
            --clip-path:
                    polygon( 0 0, 100% 0, 100% 100%, 0 100% );
            background-color: rgba(var(--login-arrow-color), 0);
 
        }
 
        #login-status #account-topbutton::before{
            --clip-path:
                    polygon( 30% 35%, 70% 35%, 50% 60%, 50% 60% );
            --mask-image: initial;
            content: "";
            position: absolute;
            top: 0;
            left: 0;
            width: 100%;
            height: 100%;
            background-color: rgba(var(--login-arrow-color), 1);
            -webkit-clip-path: var(--clip-path);
            clip-path: var(--clip-path);
        }
 
        #login-status #account-topbutton::before,
        #login-status:not(:focus-within) #account-topbutton::before,
        #login-status:not(:focus-within) #account-topbutton:hover::before {
            --clip-path:
                    polygon( 30% 35%, 70% 35%, 50% 60%, 50% 60% );
            --mask-image: initial;
        }
 
        #login-status:not(:focus-within) #account-topbutton::after {
            display: none;
        }
 
        #login-status:not(:focus-within) *:not(#account-topbutton):not([href*="account/messages"]) {
            --clip-path:
                    polygon(
                        0 0,
                        100% 0,
                        100% 100%,
                        0 100%
                    );
            pointer-events: all;
            -webkit-clip-path: var(--clip-path);
            clip-path: var(--clip-path);
        }
 
        #login-status:not(:focus-within) *:not(#account-topbutton):not(#account-options):not([href*="account/messages"]) {
            opacity: 1;
        }
 
        #login-status #my-account {
            --wght: 300;
        }
 
        #account-options {
            background: var(--gradient-header);
        }
 
        #search-top-box {
            top: 1.5em;
            right: 3%;
            background: rgba(var(--search-focus-textbox-bg-color), 0.4);
        }
 
         #search-top-box:focus-within ~ #login-status {
            opacity: 1;
        }
 
        #search-top-box::after {
            transition:
                background-color 150ms cubic-bezier(0.4, 0, 0.2, 1),
                -webkit-clip-path 150ms cubic-bezier(0.4, 0, 0.2, 1);
            transition:
                background-color 150ms cubic-bezier(0.4, 0, 0.2, 1),
                clip-path 150ms cubic-bezier(0.4, 0, 0.2, 1);
            transition:
                background-color 150ms cubic-bezier(0.4, 0, 0.2, 1),
                clip-path 150ms cubic-bezier(0.4, 0, 0.2, 1),
                -webkit-clip-path 150ms cubic-bezier(0.4, 0, 0.2, 1);
        }
 
        #search-top-box:not(:focus-within)::after {
            --clip-path:
                    polygon(
                        0 0,
                        100% 0,
                        100% 100%,
                        0% 100%
                    );
            background-color: rgba(var(--search-icon-bg-color, --dark-accent), 1);
            -webkit-clip-path: var(--clip-path);
            clip-path: var(--clip-path);
        }
 
        #search-top-box:not(:focus-within):hover::after {
            --clip-path:
                    polygon(
                        0 0,
                        100% 0,
                        100% 100%,
                        0 100%
                    );
            background-color: rgb(var(--search-icon-hover-bg-color));
        }
 
        #search-top-box form[id="search-top-box-form"]:not(:focus-within) {
            max-width: var(--search-width);
        }
 
        #search-top-box form[id="search-top-box-form"]:not(:focus-within) input[type="text"] {
            max-width: var(--search-width);
            padding: 0 var(--search-height) 0 1em;
            outline-width: 0;
            background-color: rgb(var(--search-focus-textbox-bg-color), 0.35);
            color: rgba(var(--search-textbox-text-color), 0.4);
            cursor: pointer;
        }
 
        #search-top-box form[id="search-top-box-form"]:not(:focus-within) input[type="submit"],
        #search-top-box form[id="search-top-box-form"]:focus-within input[type="submit"] {
            pointer-events: all;
            border: none;
        }
 
    }
 
    #page-title::after,
    .meta-title::after,
    #page-title::before,
    .meta-title::before {
        content: "";
        flex-grow: 1;
        height: 0.0625rem;
        background: rgb(var(--swatch-primary));
    }
 
    #page-title::before,
    .meta-title::before {
        margin: auto 1.25rem auto auto;
    }

Welcome to the SCP Foundation Regulation Nexus. Here you will find information about regulations, rules and laws that are crucial to your progression within the Foundation.

---

> Foundation Laws

The Foundation Laws are responsible for maintaining order, peace and security within the Foundation. They outline the Foundation's purpose and how it should be administrated among other things.

+ Show Executive Orders

> Executive Order #1 ; Judicial Reformation & Revision

---

1.1 ; Department Directorate Jurisdiction Increase
As per removal of some laws, departments are hereby responsible of their own subdivision and no longer require the approval of the entire council to open them, a Director may get the authorization from the overseer, the O5 Head or the Administrator in order to authorize fund uses for said subdivision. Do note the expansion of regular ranks is only to be approved by the director, however it can be veto'ed by the overseer should there be an limitation to it.
⠀
Further more, all Directors are hereby authorized to make structural changes to their department without the direct approval from their overseer, their overseer, should they have an objection, must manifest it immediately upon the decision being taken by the division's directorate. The Overseer is authorized to have the rank shutdown should that rank be in offense of their division's goals or in offense of a foundation's law. Directors are also permitted to enact new duties with the approval of the O5-Head and the respective departmental Overseer.
⠀
Directorates are now responsible of their decision in taking on high ranks.
Directorates are responsible for the well being of their department and may be purged/removed (as well the administration) if the Overseer finds them incapable of completing their duties.
⠀
Members of the departments may not undermine the power of their high rankings, directorate or overseer, any offense will be reviewed by the Directorate and overseer should it be required.

---

1.2 ; O5 Council Powers
The O5 Council will once again be immune from prosecution. Recently, the council has been incessantly hindered by DoR cases and other prosecutions with false intent. The Council should be fully capable of going through their work without malicious prosecution and misuse of the Department of Regulations and council should have full jurisdiction and ability to make laws without being interrupted. The O5 Council may no longer be MONC'd.
⠀
If a Councilor is found acting with corrupt or malicious intent, the council will review that councilor's standing and decide what the appropriate punishment will be, depending on the severity of the crime.
⠀
Any past crime conducted by O5 Councilors until now are voided and may not be presented in court.

---

1.3 ; Site Specific Laws
The Board of Directors and O5 Council may no longer create laws for a specific site. They may however create an amendment for a site to be obligated to follow a minimal foundation standard. This expends upon the developer's terms of service and is enforced to provide fairness between a developer's choice and the community's wishes.
⠀
All sites are at all times required to be filtering enabled as per ROBLOX standards.
⠀
All requests for new items and/or assets must go through the MaD and be responded to by a site director or member of the administration of the MaD. Leaving a request unattended for over 96 hours makes it automatically approved. The developer or member of manufacturing in charge of said request is responsible of making people aware of delays or issues. They may request the MaD overseer to release a statement of developmental delays. The period of delay can be up to 2 months, or extended if approved by the MaD overseer. The person issuing the delay does not have to report about it again until the delay has been reached. A trello board will be created to handle more efficient information gathering.

---

1.4 ; Laws Redaction
Laws are hereby prohibited from being redacted at any given time due to false information being spread over them. Any an all redacted laws are hereby declassified

---

> Executive Order #2 ; Expansion of Research Departmental Powers

---

1.1 ; Science Division
The Science Division (ScD) will receive authority to regulate over the use of SCPs (with the exception of SCP-500), SCP testing (with the exception of regulating the number of combative personnel for a test) and may change the classification of an SCP, these regulations will be enforced by the Internal Security Department and Ethics Committee. Any foundation law/regulation with a similar topic/subject to "Spectator Priority Ordinance" will now be under the authority and jurisdiction of the Science Division.

---

1.2 ; Medical Department
The Medical Department (MD) will receive authority to regulate over the use of any medical equipment including SCP-500 and may enforce these regulations. Any department that is permitted to use any medical equipment that has not been regulated by the Medical Department may impose regulations on it for their own personnel; however, regulations on any medical equipment not imposed by the Medical Department may become invalidated should the Medical Department administration impose regulations on it or deem it unfit. The following actions may be taken by the Medical Department should an individual break a medical regulation:

- Restrict the individual's use of any medical equipment for a limited amount of time.
- Ban the individual from using any medical equipment should he/she continuously break medical regulations or use any medical equipment while on suspension (temporarily restricted from using medical equipment).

---

1.3 ; Ethics Committee
The Ethics Committee (EC) will be the only exception to regulate and enforce the fair use of SCPs, moral SCP testing and regulate any medical equipment that are capable of causing harm to foundation personnel. The Ethics Committee may deem a ScD/MD or any department regulation/action regarding medical equipment (specifically, any medical equipment that is capable of causing harm to foundation personnel) or SCP/SCP testing ethical or not by creating and passing a code regarding it.
⠀
Evidently, the O5 Council, should an issue persist involving the Ethics Committee regarding a code or regarding a department regulation, may interfere and hold the final say regarding the controversial code/regulation.
⠀
Should any abuse of power or negligence occur from the Ethics Committee, Science Division or Medical Department, they're either to be brought to their respective overseer or to the O5 Council.

---

> Executive Order #3 ; O5 Re-Induction Ordinance

---

The following Executive order will re-establish the ability for a former O5-Councillor to be inducted into the council again under a last-resort condition.

---

This executive order will allow former O5s to be able to be re-inducted under the following circumstances:

- There is no other option; the former O5 will only be inducted if it is an emergent situation and no other high rank presents themselves to be a possibility:

- There are no suitable L-4s to become the overseer of said department.
- There are no suitable O5s/L-5s to choose from to become the overseer of said department.

- Said former O5 must be at the rank of L-4+ a member in 1 division.
- The former councilor must not have committed any criminal offenses since his/her term in the council ended.
- The council must have a 75% majority at a minimum to re-induct the O5.

- The Administrator must approve of said O5 being inducted.

- If the former councilor was impeached, he/she may not be re-inducted to the council.

---

Limitations the re-inducted councilor will have:
- Running for O5-Head after being re-inducted will be prohibited.

---

Frequently the council is put into a position that they induct people due to lack of better choice and this can prove to be detrimental with diabolical councilors coming to power and affecting the foundation in many ways, often irreversible. With the possibility of older councilors coming back, as small as it may be, they have the chance to express thoughts and do what they previously may have failed to do. The restrictions put in place ensure that newer members will also have a much greater advantage and no bias will occur if a re-induction of a councilor is to happen.

---

> Executive Order #4 ; Revised Division Limits

---

Recently, the administration has noticed a lack of personnel to go around. This has been especially detrimental to the minor departments because finding new employees proves rather difficult when capable personnel are capped by the division limit. Thus, I hereby revise the division limits to:

- Two (2) majors and one (1) minor
- One (1) major and two (2) minors
- Three (3) minors

You'll notice that limits two and three remain the same as before. Only the limit governing those in two major departments has changed. This effectively normalizes all the division limits to three departments.

---

> Executive Order #5 ; On-Site Events Regulations

---

The reason this Executive Order was put into place is to regulate the quality of events and ensure that events are being held at the highest standard. Being able to hold events is a privilege, thus the events held should reflect that. This Executive Order also serves as regulations for who can host events as well as other rules and/or regulations regarding them.

---

SECTION 1 - Personnel:

- CLAUSE 1.1: The only people that are permitted to hold events on-site are: Site Managers, Site Directors, O5 Councilors, and the Administrator.
- CLAUSE 1.2: The ability to host events can be revoked due to unprofessional conduct while hosting events, hosting inappropriate events, or hosting immature events not relating to the Foundation.

- Site Managers may have their hosting ability revoked by the Site Director team, through a majority vote in the O5 Council, or by the O5 Head/Administrator.
- Site Directors may have their hosting ability revoked by a majority vote in the Council or by the O5 Head/Administrator.
- Councilors may have their hosting ability revoked by the O5 Head/Administrator.

SECTION 2 - Event Rules:

- CLAUSE 2.1: Events are to only revolve around the SCP Foundation or about SCPs themselves. (Examples include but are not limited to raids, new SCPs, GoIs, riots, site malfunctions, etc.)
- CLAUSE 2.2: Events that are off-topic, immature, inappropriate, or violate the Roblox Terms of Service may lead to the ability to host events being revoked.
- CLAUSE 2.3: Abusing admin during an event is not tolerated; admin is to only be used up to what is necessary for an event.

---

+ Show Foundation Acts

> Mandatory Background Checks for Divisional Entry Act

---

Department high-ranking officials who have the ability to accept individuals into their department will be mandated to acknowledge and comply to this revised act.

---

Individuals who passed any entry mechanism are mandated to be background checked prior being officially accepted into the department's group, the individual MUST meet the following requirements:

- Not in or affiliated with any official (approved by the Foundation) hostile GoIs.
- Not have a visibly indecent and/or offensive username that violates the ROBLOX ToS.
- Not affiliated or allied with malicious or DST individuals.
- Not violate the division level rule (Executive Order #4 ; Revised Division Limits).
- Not have an account age of less than five (5) months.
- Not have an extensive criminal background by having three (3) or more prior Class-E Sentences.

---

In the case where the individual has failed to meet any of these requirements, they'll automatically be denied acceptance into the department and it's group.
⠀
Should department high-ranking officials fail to comply to the mandatory background check, they will be subject to disciplinary action by DSI for negligence to this act.

---

> Administration Loyalty Act

---

Even though the FAR has been repealed, it does not mean that administrative personnel in GOIs or other SCPFs should be in a foreign group's intelligence groups. Level-4+ members will be required to leave all said groups if they're currently present within them no matter what the group's status is(Ally or Natural).
⠀
If this law passes, all L-4+ will be restricted from taking part or being in any Foreign intelligence group that is apart of the SCPF genre.
⠀
If a L4+ is found to be taking part in said intelligence activities or being apart of an intelligence group within the genre they will be immediately stripped of their executive clearance and suspended within their departments until the matter has been settled by the intelligence sector and the O5 Council.

---

Members of the administration who have ownership of groups such as an SCPF or GOI that has a department which takes part in intelligence activities will only be allowed to remain in their executive status if their group is allied to our SCPF or is in the work of creating an alliance with our SCPF.
⠀
GOC's ORACLE will be immune from the ALA, however, they will not be allowed into the council.

---

> Alternative Accounts Regulation Act

---

Currently, there is no solid regulation in regards to alternative accounts in the Foundation Law. This law defines everything that is needed to know for authorization of Alternative Accounts and punishments for violating this law.

---

SECTION 1: Alternative accounts may not be permitted in the foundation under any circumstances unless stated otherwise in §1-1 & §1-2. If unauthorized alternative accounts are in the foundation, it will be considered as an illegal act and they will be dealt with accordingly.

- CLAUSE 1.1: Alternative accounts may only be authorized by:

- Intelligence Directorate
- DSI Special Agent +
- O5 Council +

- CLAUSE 1.2: Alternative accounts created and currently being used by Intelligence Departments do not count as illegal and require no enforcement.
- CLAUSE 1.3: Notification is to be given for the alternative account to the necessary people; unless if it's under a certain dire circumstance to keep it confidential from others.

SECTION 2: Punishments for illegal Alternative Accounting, in severity, will be judged by the Class-E System.

- CLAUSE 2.1: Any illegal alternative accounts considered to be malicious will be viable for an immediate Permanent Class-E at the bare minimum. This includes spies originating from anywhere, and/or criminals avoiding their Class-E sentence, etc.

---

> Cyberspace Protection Act

---

The Cyberspace Protection Act (CPA) is dedicated to ensuring a safer environment for role-playing and gaming in general.

---

The following shall henceforth be strictly prohibited, under penalty of law:

- DDOS (Distributed Denial-of-Service) attack(ing) any member of the community, or communal assets.
- Location Tracking (IP addresses, Tracking addresses).
- Stalking.

- Stalking is defined as the unlawful or unwanted pursuit of personal information. Unlawful or unwanted pursuit of personal information is defined as what is not voluntarily distributed by an individual OR what is not publicly accessible via one’s discord or ROBLOX profile.

- Distribution or collection of inappropriate photos or images.
- Even in the instance where said distribution is consensual, barring any external relationships, with the exception of private gatherings unknowable by the public and consented to by all involved parties.
- Witch Hunting of any current or past member of the community, regardless of crimes, real and perceived.
- Posting official documentation or evidence in a manner which requires downloading in order to facilitate viewership, or otherwise posting exclusively downloadable links in a public communication channel.
- Any other actions, physical or digital, not defined in this act which could foreseeably cause a negative impact to the physical persons or property of any community member or ex-community member.
- The threatening, jokingly or otherwise of any of the above actions which could foreseeably cause a negative impact to the physical persons or property of any community member or ex-community member.

---

To the extent that one is found guilty of the above crimes;
⠀
Appeal is permitted, and will be granted in the instance where an individual can provide evidence or otherwise prove that there was no malicious intention, and there was no real threat.
⠀
In the instance where a perceived threat (even if provably not real) adversely affects the reputation, behavior, health, or property of an affected persons (with evidence to support), this exception is void.

---

Exceptions to the act:
⠀
In the context in which two or more individuals are discussing the subject and are clearly joking with one another, it is solely up to the discretion of moderation teams and the executive branch whether or not there is a threat, real or perceived. Should it be determined that there is no threat, they are permitted to invoke this exception.
⠀
Individuals educating others (e.g. in a council-approved seminar or announcement) on the subject, or who post a YouTube video or otherwise downloadable link with permission from a member of the moderation team, or legislative body/council.

---

> Civil Sector Restrictions Act

---

This bill should it pass legislature, will bar any Civil Departments from creating or sponsoring any division that can be labeled as "Combative". This is to ensure Civil Departments do not cross their boundaries in attempts to gain unnecessary authority over others.
⠀
The only exception to this act will be for special military units that have a valid purpose for existing, such as the Medical Department's and the Security Department's joint unit, Combat Medics. For any Civil Department to even consider the idea of making a subdivision that could be considered as "Combatives" they MUST present the idea to one of the two already existing military departments, have it directly attached to one of them, and have their Director/Overseer approve of the concept, then the O5 Council will take it to a vote and decide whether to commission said unit or not.

Should one Department decline the idea, the proposal overall is rejected by the Military Sector. This is to prevent a scenario such as "Go ask mom, go ask dad, etc.".

---

> Classified Subcomponents Restriction Act

---

No division is publicly and administratively "classified" (besides DSI). Any division or persons involving themselves in the internal/domestic affairs of the Foundation, save the O5 Council, are subject to immediate detainment and interrogation for abuse of powers.
⠀
Issues regarding the divisions will remain divisional affairs, and administrative affairs will be handled accordingly by the Council.

---

> Council Release from the CoE Act

---

This motion will unbind the O5 Council from the Code of Ethics, essentially granting them their once-omnipotent power (except for if they're acting stupid or if they abuse their privilege, then that's where the problem is created).
⠀
The benefit of this will allow the O5 Council to further conduct their various duties in the Foundation without fear of the Ethics Committee jumping on them. As well, various activities (such as bringing all Class D to a chamber and testing without a reason) could be held in the off chance that there are many Class D but no exciting tests or scientists could not be bothered to get up off their chairs and call for Class D.
⠀
It seems like a logical decision to not keep O5s bound to ethics but only to moral, administrative and council law. The O5 Council already has enough laws to remember; no true harm in taking a full-blown ethical constitution out of the equation.
⠀
In addition, this motion states that the O5 Council is recommended to follow it, but is not demanded to follow it.

---

> Declassification Act

---

This motion serves to ensure that all non-secret (Non-IA/ISD/A1) guidelines are made publicly available to Foundation Personnel. I first thought of this motion about 4 months or more ago, due to a recent "leak". This leak consisted of the Security Department's SOP guidelines, and the leaker allegedly mass-pinged users to bring attention to it. This of course lead to annoyance due to the pings and multiple new users spreading the document further, simply because it was "secret".
-

- Person 1 is in a department such as SD as a recruit, they have access to the basic documents and Trello boards to help them.
- Person 1 gets fired for not completing their requirements, and so gets angry.
They make a copy of the SD board and guide and move on to mass-pinging/spamming in the Discord(s) with links to these guides.

-
When I became CML about a year ago, someone attempted to harm the division by spreading the activity board - the most useless thing to spread at the time. Of course it didn't hurt, however the user got banned from the SCPF Discord for spamming. After that I made the guides and boards public to prevent it from happening again.
⠀
I'd also like to state that having your guides public will allow potential recruits to see how you function, and therefore have more knowledge when they turn up at your tryouts/interviews or apply.
-
Of course, this could easily be avoided if departments made their guidelines public. Have you ever seen someone try leaking the ScD guide? Making things private leads to the human mind wanting to spread it.

---

> Development Terms of Service Act

---

Development ToS

---

Some individuals have been taking advantage of the fact that there is no solid paperwork regarding the development field. This comes in many forms - 4 examples being the following:

- Ignoring Foundational Laws
- Bypassing applications
- Running to the Administrator to support a case against someone else (usually a hostility/"superiority"/arrogance case)
- Pointing towards there being no solid rules

The following Development Terms of Service shall ensure a solid, documented grasp on the development field. With this document, the administration may bring it up against any individual who is found to be overstepping their bounds by using their position in MaD, the Foundation or any Roblox-associated party (i.e. RBXDev) to get as they desire.
⠀
The Development Terms of Service binds all developers to be in MaD or hold the rank of Site Director to officially be developers. It also binds various conditions regarding their work - read through to understand some more.
⠀
This isn't only to subdue a few divergent individuals who refuse to comply with any form of ruling. This will also ensure that, in the future, should any situation arise, the affiliated parties may be redirected to this document to be notified that the individual in question came into conflict with the terms outlined by the group's highest-level administration regarding development.

---

> Divisional Rank Structure Act

---

Level clearances will now be associated with divisional ranks. Applications for Level-1 to Level-3 clearances are halted. Level-0 applications are used for entrance into the Foundation's ranks and the allowance of personnel to enter certain departments.
⠀
Level-5: Directors of a department. Assistant Directors of major departments.
Level-4: Assistant Directors of certain departments. High rank in any department.
Level-3: Middle rank or low tier high rank in any department.
Level-2: Senior members of a department.
Level-1: Experienced members of a department that have passed basic training.
Level-0: New members that are in the learning process of a department.
⠀
Explanation of rank and clearance
A personnel's authority is to be seen according to their department's position, NOT by their level clearance. Personnel will receive the clearance of the higher department's rank for that will be considered their main department. Directors hold the authority of preventing personnel from achieving a higher rank within their department if the personnel hold's a different rank in another department that grants the individual a higher level clearance. Level clearances are given to personnel in accordant to their department's rank. Level clearances do NOT provide a personnel with a higher department's rank.
⠀
Executives
Individuals who hold the clearance of 4 and 5 are considered Executive Personnel. These individuals hold a special authority within their departments and are granted membership within the Administrative Department. Executives are in a leadership position of their department. Executive membership will not be granted to followers. The behavior of Executives must be met with the proper expectations and act as an example of highly esteemed individuals within the Foundation.
⠀
Upon retirement, O5 Councilors will be granted Level-4 clearance as an incentive for their long and dedicated service to the Council. If so they remain to be within the Foundation, former Councilors are expected to be active in the Administrative community. This does not apply to past councilors before the passing of this motion.
⠀
Authority of DSI
DSI will be required to enforce this motion in regards to having the proper level clearance according to the individual's department rank. The Directorate of DSI holds the right to take action towards violating personnel and provide the proper level clearance. DSI will hold no authority to an individual's department rank. DSI will be required to communicate any personnel's clearance change to the personnel's senior staff.
⠀
Authority of the O5 Council
The Overseers hold the authority to change level clearance grants within their department. The Council may not allow an individual to be a director of more than one department.
⠀
Rank Structure
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1uTsw_XtB781-8tAly51nm4KjQ0bLBaWTMYxKQ-5XzqQ/edit#gid=0

---

> Establishment of the Office of Inspectors General Act

---

At present, the foundation has an intricately established system to process both legal and ethical violations. However, a need for independent arbitration between departments and other departments, departments and their employees, and departments and the foundation as a whole has grown as of late. Traditionally, departmental administrations worked out these issues. As one might expect, this yields mixed results. Mixed results often require intervention from a higher body. This act aims to correct this problem by placing qualified arbitrators within each department to perform such functions.
⠀
Organization:

1. With the passing of this Act (IGA), the "Office of Inspectors General" (IG) will be officially established under the "Ethics Committee" (EC).
2. The EC administration shall be responsible for the maintenance, oversight, and management of IG.
3. EC shall appoint one (1) "Head Inspector" (HG) to assist in the maintenance, oversight, and management of IG.
4. IG, while affiliated and managed under EC, is an "independent office." Meaning that the office is expected to run itself without outside intervention unless demonstrated to be absolutely necessary.

Clearance:

1. IG shall be granted L4 clearance.
2. HG shall be granted L4 or L5 clearance at the discretion of the EC Overseer.

Expectations 1:
In order to serve as an IG, individuals must meet certain standards,

1. Individuals must be well-versed in the "Code of Ethics" (CoE).
2. Individuals must be well-versed in the "Penal Code" (PC).
3. Individuals must be educated and well-versed in any other relevant departmental and foundation laws in accordance with the purpose of IG.
4. Individuals must have "management" or at least 3 months of experience in the department they are assigned to.

- Management experience is defined as holding rank in the said department which grants Level-4 according to the "Divisional Rank Structure" (RSM).

5. IGs may only be removed by the HG, EC Editor, Overseer, respective department's Overseer, or a majority vote of the EC BoD.

Expectations 2:
In order to serve as an HG, individuals must meet certain standards.

1. Individuals must have 3 months of experience as an IG, or 3 months of experience in the now decommissioned "Department of Regulations," (DoR) prior to the establishment of this act, or management experience in DoR prior to the establishment of this act.
2. Individuals must be nominated by the respective department's directorate.

- I.E. E&T Directorate nominates the candidate for E&T's IG post.

3. Individuals must be approved by a majority vote of the EC "Board of Directors" (BoD), Editor, Overseer, and the respective department's Overseer.
4. HGs may only be removed by the EC Editor or Overseer.
5. IGs cannot hold a position in the department they are assigned to.

- This means that candidates coming from within the department they will be assigned to must relinquish their position within that department upon approval.

6. HGs cannot hold a position in any department.

Legal Duties:

1. IGs shall have a conditional fiduciary duty to the department assigned.

- This duty is binding unless in the opinion of the individual IG and/or the HG that upholding the said duty will cause undue, severe harm to the referrer of a complaint, another department, or the foundation itself.

2. IGs shall have a duty of due care to both the department assigned and referrers of complaints.

- This means that IGs must do their research in order to properly arbitrate complaints.
- IG must also transfer cases they believe they cannot fairly and properly arbitrate to the HG.

3. The attorney-client privilege applies to interactions between the IG or HG and any individual manager or directorate member of the department assigned.
4. The attorney-client privilege applies to interactions between the IG or HG and the collective management or directorate of the department assigned.
5. Items 3 and 4 do not apply if and only if they would prevent a complaint against the department assigned from being properly arbitrated.
6. The intentional or unintentional violation of any of these duties is grounds for dismissal from IG or HG.

Arbitration Process

1. When any employee of the foundation believes they have been harmed, unfairly treated, or otherwise dealt an injustice to by a department, they shall submit a formal complaint to that department's assigned IG.
2. The assigned IG shall review the complaint and supporting evidence, if any, is offered to determine the validity of the complaint.
3. Complaints SHALL NOT be referred to the HG.
4. If the complaint is not valid in the opinion of the assigned IG, the complaint shall be discarded with ethical or legal reasoning provided.
5. If the complaint is valid, the IG shall work with the assigned department's directorate and the referrer of the complaint to reach a mutually acceptable solution.
6. If a mutually acceptable solution cannot be reached, or one of the parties does not believe the solution to be mutually acceptable:

- The directorate shall consult their Overseer to conduct a review of the complaint, the evidence, and the arbitration process. The Overseer may overturn, modify, or uphold the solution.
- The referrer shall consult the HG to conduct a review of the complaint, the evidence, and the arbitration process. The HG may then choose to discard the appeal or consult the Overseer to overturn or modify the solution.

7. Only Overseers, the O5 Head, and the Administrator shall hold the power to modify or overturn a solution reached through IG arbitration.

Conclusion:
The IG is intended to fill a void left with the removal of DoR, while simultaneously being a much simpler and more flexible system.

---

> Executive Of The Month Program Act

---

The "Executive Of The Month" monthly program will be established and administered by the O5-Council to award outstanding Foundation executives (out of the entire administration) in accomplishing their duties and showing significant effort during the course of the month. The sole purpose of this program is to ensure that hardworking executives who also poses as an upstanding role-model are recognized within the Foundation administration and ultimately provided an act of appreciation by the O5-Council.

---

There will be two types of certification that Foundation executives are able to obtain near the end of each month:
"Executive of The Month" Certificate:
Obtained through demonstrating outstanding performance and diligence in their executive and departmental duties, and has also shown to be a perfect role-model of a Foundation executive as result of good behavior and ultimately complying to the standard of a "Foundation Executive".
Awarded executives will be given an exclusive certificate by a member of the Council and have their own picture put on Foundation sites. Other benefits may be included.
"Exemplary Role Model" Certificate:
Obtained by going all-out at being an exemplary role model not only amongst the administration base but also among all Foundation personnel through being able to achieve or actively participate in significant changes in Foundation affairs and benefiting them (or many individuals) to a great extent. This certificate is specifically awarded to those who has exerted much effort in creating lasting and notable changes.
Awarded executives will be given an exclusive certificate signed by members of the Council and the Administrator, and will have a special picture put on Foundation sites. Other benefits may be included.

---

Regulations:

CLAUSE 1. In order to qualify for a certificate, the standards (stated in it's description) must be met and recommended by a member of the Council to be put up for review and discussion.

- In the case that no executive qualifies, no one will be awarded a certificate for the month.

---

> Executive Status for Past Overseers Doctrine Act

---

Level-4

In order for a past O5 in Eltork's Foundation to be granted Level-4, the following requirements must be met:

- Cannot have been impeached from their position
- Cannot have been removed by the Administrator from their position
- Cannot have left the group after resigning

If the individual meets these requirements, a Council vote will take place to decide whether or not he or she shall receive L-4.

Level-5

In order for a past O5 in Eltork's Foundation to be granted Level-4, the following requirements must be met:

- In order for a past O5 in Eltork’s foundation to qualify for L-5, he or she must have been an O5 Head, along with meeting the aforementioned requirements. A Council vote would again be the deciding factor for the individual to receive L-5.

---

The Administrator may override these votes at any time should he see fit.

---

> Forbidding Purges Act

---

Upon the decision to act on punishing a specific group of individuals; only those who are at fault for committing the crime, or those who have failed to meet the objective, will be subject to punishment. Fellow peers who have not been in any way involved during such incidents will not be subject to extreme measures of punishment enacted by their Department Administration, the Council, and the Administrator.
This motion has been introduced by The Administrator and he will, therefore, be held accountable in enforcing this Act by the Personnel of the Foundation.

---

> Lawful Revision Act

---

If this law passes, any and all statements in any laws written that have passed stating that any department has the right to edit motions without having to pass a revision for said law simply to the fact that they are in ownership of said document, have the authority to edit it, or any other form of attempting to bypass the Administrative Hub, Administrative Assembly, Board of Directors, and the O5 council will be removed.

---

Laws will no longer be allowed to contain the following,

EXAMPLE:
"This law may be revised, edited, amended, and changed in any way by the [Blank] department by majority vote and approval by directorate"
⠀
or
⠀
"The department of [blank] has full ownership of this document and may edit, copy, and delete this document and is in full ownership of it."

---

In conclusion, the creators of laws will not be allowed to state who can or can't revise their laws. To revise a motion it must be revised from the place it was first passed (Administrative Assembly, Administrative Hub, Board of Directors, and O5 Council). This motion will ensure that no other department can by pass the Administrative department because one of their representatives in the assembly, a member of administration, or a member of the board of directors stating that they're department has the right to edit or revise laws that has already became a law without having to go through the Administrative Department's legislation bodies (AA, AD, BoD, Council).

---

> Level-0 Application Revamp Act

---

As it stands, the Level-0 application is extremely complicated (for new CDs wanting to give our Foundation a shot) and seems to discourage any form of active participation in our Foundation's personnel sector, due to its length and overall difficulty, thus giving the impression that being a personnel requires extreme knowledge of lore and ability to answer menial questions about SCPs.
⠀
Should this motion come to pass, the Level-0 Application will be changed to:
-

Question 1. What is the Special Containment Procedures Foundation (SCPF) and what are our goals? (in your own words)
⠀
Question 2. What is a SCP? Why are they harmful, or in some cases, helpful?
⠀
Question 3. What is a department? What do they do to help the Foundation?
⠀
Question 4. Name and describe a SCP of your choosing. Please cite (place the link to the SCP from scp-wiki.com) the SCP below.
⠀
Question 5. What do you plan to do if you're accepted? (be descriptive)

---

This also makes it easier for our executives (who are already overstressed) to read applications without having to consult a laundry list of different sources to answer a single application when our influx is already quite large.

---

> Retaliation Prohibition Act

---

Often times we speak of the idea that personnel are encouraged to report incidents of abuse, bias; unfair situations that generally target an individual or group of people. While this is often times done, it is typically met with retaliation. Whether it be a department or unit blacklist, termination, or other means of silencing one. This is not okay.
⠀

Individuals that take action against someone else through the Department of Regulations shall not fall victim to retaliation. Individuals that sue someone else shall not be:
⠀
- Blacklisted
- Terminated
- Harassed

or face any other means of retaliation as determined by the Department of Regulations. Circumstances that fall under retaliation outside of this law are subject to ruling by a Department of Regulations Judge.

---

> Revised Vigilant Act

---

In order to preserve security and allow for a second pair of eyes in each departmental server associated with the foundation, each department head will be required to allow the following number of agents from the Department of Special Intelligence (DSI) into their servers:

- MTF, SD, ScD, DEA > - Two (2)
- E&T, EC, MaD, MD > - One (1)

The role given to agents of DSI should be allowed to read messages and the message history of every channel bar directorate channels. It must also be able to ban members from the server to allow for quick, mass cleaning of messages. Agents should only use this power in dire circumstances when no administration member of the department is able to. In the event this power is used, agents are required to inform a directorate member of the department.
⠀
DSI agents are not permitted to overstep the boundary of their duties while exercising their role of overwatch in any departmental server. Overstepping is henceforth defined as:
⠀
"To act in a manner contrary to the purpose of observing and/or documenting regular activity or identifying and removing illegal content from the server. DSI does not have permission to speak, critique, suggest, or otherwise participate in the day-to-day activities of the given server. They are to serve only as silent moderators."
This applies to all departments of SCPF EXCEPT:

- Department of Special Intelligence
- Administrative Department

---

> Executive Promotion Investigation Act

---

This act will provide a database to the Board of Directors and the Council to exploit the skills of DSI's investigation status, to look into the canidate recommend for the promotion of Executive clearance. The purpose of this is to provide a flexible system where agents of DSI can look into a certain individual and clear them for an Executive promotion. This will ensure that they are secure enough and aren't found with any negative databases such as past reports, CE's, DST's, FB's, or suspicious conduct on their profile.

---

SECTION 1 - DSI Conduct:

1.1. DSI will either Pass or Fail an account based off of past reports, Class-E's, or suspicious account activity.

1.1.A. DSI may NOT fail an Executive candidate based off of personal opinions, relations, or behaviors.
1.1.B DSI are allowed to use external sources such as unofficial discord servers or group chats to determine characteristics of a potential threat.

1.1.B.A. DSI will NOT be allowed to use external sources as evidence if the conversation is NOT about the SCPF.

1.2. Once DSI Pass or Fail the Executive, it is the creator of the card's responsibility to carry out the rest of the promotion to the Executive.

1.2.A. The creator may not share information found or not found on that certain personnel since it classifies under "INTEL."

SUBSECTION 1 - Board of Directors & Recommendations:
The Board of Directors and up have the responsibility to creating a card on the Trello Database and to assure that DSI is aware of this. Once DSI takes action on that card, they will then investigate the Executive candidate and provide intel to the Board of Director's and up on that promotion. If DSI find the account to be a suitable threat, they can deny the ability to be promoted to Executive.

1.1.1. The Board of Directors and up must provide all information listed on the card to assist DSI's investigation.

1.1.1.A. Any further found information that has "suspicious" behavior on them may be added to the card for an easier investigation.

---

SECTION 2 - Updated channels on main SCPF Discord:
For communications with DSI and the promoter.

2.1. A channel would be created for the BoD+ and DSI, to communicate on individuals for Executive clearance. Once again, no personal opinion may be shared on that individual by DSI, they will reflect their decision on the card.
SUBSECTION 2 - Trello:

2.2.1. A Trello will be developed for the BoD+ and DSI can use. On that board will be templates, set of instructions, and approval process will be located on that board to assist the process.

---

> Information Classification Method Act Revision

---

ICM

---

> Disciplinary Legislation Revision Act

---

This piece of legislation aims to reform the various forms of disciplinary measures the Foundation retains which includes but is not limited to: Class-E sentences, DST statutes, Foundation Blacklist(s), and Permanent Class-E statutes. In addition to these changes, the appeals system will be reformed and include changes to the Penal Code. Upon passage of this legislation, the Penal Code and the Criminal Sentencing Legislation will be updated in accordance to it.

---

SECTION 1 - REMOVAL OF PERMANENT CLASS-E ASSIGNMENTS

- Individuals may no longer be assigned a "Permanent Class-E" sentence as of the passage of this legislation.
- Individuals currently retaining a Permanent Class-E sentence shall have their sentence transformed into a Foundation Blacklist.

SECTION 2 - FOUNDATION BLACKLIST REFORMS

CLAUSE 2.1. Foundation Blacklists will be officially defined as and assigned to those who: "poses a security and/or non-security threat to the welfare of the Foundation or in any of it's activities through civil or administrative misconduct whether it be excessive or not."
CLAUSE 2.2. In order for an individual to be requested or assigned a "Foundation Blacklist" status, the individual must of been sentenced five times with each having at least a 96-hour duration in a six-month timespan, or has committed a crime that would automatically qualify for a Foundation Blacklist.
CLAUSE 2.3. Those who have a "Foundation Blacklist" status will be prohibited from retaining admission or participating in any activity related to the Foundation.
CLAUSE 2.4. Foundation Blacklist designation(s) may be appealed via the Ethics Committee with just reasoning unless it has been authorized by the Council or received "MAKSUR" authorization.

- In the event that it was authorized by the Council or is assigned with "MAKSUR" authorization, it must either be appealed by the O5-Council, the O5-Head, or the Administrator.

SECTION 3 - CLASS-E ASSIGNMENTS UPDATE

CLAUSE 3.1. Upon the passing of this legislation, the duration of Class-E sentences may be determined by the Board Of Directors through a majority vote however, the duration must not go below or above the imposed limits included in the Penal Code..

CLAUSE 3.1.1: The Department of Special Intelligence shall still retain the permission(s) to input a recommended sentence.

CLAUSE 3.2. In the event that an individual receives multiple charges and is proven guilty of them, the duration of the CE sentence must be the total hours from the durations of each charge.
CLAUSE 3.3. Individuals may NOT be CE'ed for a crime/charge that is NOT listed in the Penal Code.
CLAUSE 3.4. The duration of a CE sentence assigned to an individual(s) must be in the consecutive sequence of 24-hours.

SECTION 4 - EMERGENCY CLASS-E ASSIGNMENTS UPDATE

CLAUSE 4.1. Emergency Class-E assignments can only be assigned to individuals who are committing a (or multiple) crime(s) in real-time and would require to be emergency CE'ed in order to prevent further chaos or continuation of the crime(s).
CLAUSE 4.2. Emergency Class-E assignments can be authorized by any member of the Board of Directors, a member of the Council, or by a Site Director.

- Authorized members who are found abusing this privilege will have it revoked and disciplinary action may incur.

SECTION 5 - DOMESTIC SECURITY THREAT ASSIGNMENTS UPDATE

CLAUSE 5.1. Domestic Security Threat assignments will be REDEFINED to:

- "An individual or group of people (dedicated to and) found committing a form of cybernetic infiltration (DDoSing/IP leakage/personal information leakage), posing a real-life or online/cybersecurity threat (ex. blackmailing, phishing, stealing sensitive information, harassment, threats of violence, cyberbullying, etc…) to an individual that would extend the bounds of the SCPF community, and sharing NSFW content unwillingly to other individual(s)."

CLAUSE 5.2 Individuals may be DST’ed in accordance to its definition and just reasoning by a majority vote of the O5 Council and receiving ”MAKSUR” authorization by the O5-Head or Administrator.
CLAUSE 5.3 Individuals who are currently DST’ed will be reviewed and determined by the O5 Council if they require transfer to a ”Foundation Blacklist”.
CLAUSE 5.4 The O5 Council will retain a record of DST sentences on an internal database for review at any given time.

SECTION 6 - CHANGES TO THE PENAL CODE

CLAUSE 6.1. The Penal Code will be edited to include the minimum and maximum duration limits for each criminal offense listed in the legislation, along with indicating whether or not a normal Class-E sentence can be assigned (otherwise, it may be an automatic Foundation Blacklist).
If it so requires that an individual requires a higher duration that exceeds the limits of the charge, the CE request must be sent to the O5 Council for review and approval.
SUBSECTION 1 - Addition of Limits to Criminal Offenses
The following criminal offenses will have new duration and assignment limits:

[CODE 101 - Assault]

- Min. Duration: 48 hours; Max. Duration: 168 hours; NOT eligible for an automatic FB*

[CODE 106 - Bribery]

- Min. Duration: 168 hours; Max. Duration: 720 hours; NOT eligible for an automatic FB*

[CODE 111 - Coercion]

- Min. Duration: 120 hours; Max. Duration: 720 hours; NOT eligible for an automatic FB*

[CODE 116 - Conspiracy]

- Min. Duration: 72 hours; Max. Duration: 720 hours; NOT eligible for an automatic FB*

[CODE 121 - Corruption]

- Min. Duration: 96 hours; Max. Duration: 720 hours; NOT eligible for an automatic FB*

[CODE 126 - Criminal Anarchy]

- Min. Duration: 72 hours; Max. Duration: 720 hours; NOT eligible for an automatic FB*

[CODE 131 - Criminal Contempt of Court]

- Min. Duration: 72 hours; Max. Duration: 168 hours; NOT eligible for an automatic FB*

[CODE 136 - Criminal Facilitation]

- Min. Duration: 48 hours; Max. Duration: 168 hours; NOT eligible for an automatic FB*

[CODE 141 - Criminal Tampering]

- Min. Duration: 96 hours; Max. Duration: 336 hours; NOT eligible for an automatic FB*

[CODE 146 - Disorderly Conduct]

- Min. Duration: 48 hours; Max. Duration: 168 hours; NOT eligible for an automatic FB*

[CODE 151 - Evading Detainment]

- Min. Duration: 24 hours; Max. Duration: 96 hours; NOT eligible for an automatic FB*

[CODE 156 - Failure to comply]

- Min. Duration: 48 hours; Max. Duration: 168 hours; NOT eligible for an automatic FB*

[CODE 161 - Forgery]

- Min. Duration: 96 hours; Max. Duration: 336 hours; NOT eligible for an automatic FB*

[CODE 166 - Impersonation of Class-D Personnel]

- Min. Duration: 24 hours; Max. Duration: 96 hours; NOT eligible for an automatic FB*

[CODE 171 - Official Misconduct]

- Min. Duration: 72 hours; Max. Duration: 336 hours; NOT eligible for an automatic FB*

[CODE 176 - Perjury]

- Min. Duration: 72 hours; Max. Duration: 168 hours; NOT eligible for an automatic FB*

[CODE 181 - Theft]

- Min. Duration: PERMANENT; Max. Duration: PERMANENT; ELIGIBLE for an automatic FB

[CODE 186 - Theft of Services]

- Min. Duration: 168 hours; Max. Duration: 720 hours; MAY be eligible for an automatic FB

[CODE IXX - Embezzlement]

- Min. Duration: 168 hours; Max. Duration: 720 hours; MAY be eligible for an automatic FB

[CODE 186 - Treason]

- Min. Duration: 336 hours; Max. Duration: 2,160 hours; MAY be eligible for an automatic FB

[CODE 190 - False Personation]

- Min. Duration: 96 hours; Max. Duration: 336 hours; NOT eligible for an automatic FB*

[CODE 191 - Trespassing]

- Min. Duration: 48 hours; Max. Duration: 168 hours; NOT eligible for an automatic FB*

[CODE 196 - Unlawful Surveillance]

- Min. Duration: 48 hours; Max. Duration: 168 hours; NOT eligible for an automatic FB*

[CODE 200 - Hate Crime]

- Min. Duration: 168 hours; Max. Duration: 720 hours; MAY be eligible for an automatic FB

[CODE 201 - Falsely reporting an emergency]

- Min. Duration: 48 hours; Max. Duration: 168 hours; NOT eligible for an automatic FB*

[CODE 206 - Breach of Contract]

- Min. Duration: 336 hours; Max. Duration: 2,160 hours; MAY be eligible for an automatic FB

SUBSECTION 2 - Addition & Edits of Criminal Offenses
The following criminal offenses will be added:

[CODE ###]

The following criminal offenses will be edited:

[CODE 186- Treason]
"A person is guilty of treason when:

- He knowingly acts on behalf of a Group of Interest, a foreign Foundation, or any other group to threaten the welfare and/or security of the Foundation, or;
- Acts in a hostile manner against the Foundation (i.e. leaking confidential/sensitive information, attempting a revolution), or;
- Attempts to overthrow the O5-Council."

[CODE 200 - Hate Crime]
"A person is guilty of a hate crime when:

- He acts maliciously against an individual for his religion/race/ethnicity/gender/beliefs."

[CODE 201 - Falsely reporting a breach]

- RENAMED TO: "Falsely reporting an emergency"
- "A person is guilty of falsely reporting an emergency when:

- He falsely reports an emergency via radio or online communications several times. (i.e. containment breaches, rogues, site equipment failure/malfunction)".

[CODE 181 - Theft]
"A person is guilty of theft when:

- He steals property or assets of individuals or groups, especially when stealing property from Foundation projects.

[CODE 166 - Impersonation of Class-D Personnel]
"A person is guilty of impersonating Class-D personnel when:

- He knowingly switches to the Class-D team while being Level-0 personnel+ or by wearing clothing that would depict a Class-D.

[CODE 156 - Failure to comply]
"A person is guilty of failing to comply when:

- He refuses to cooperate with instruction or command give by combative, civil, or intelligence personnel within legal and departmental boundaries; especially orders from a member of the O5-Council.

[CODE 151 - Evading Detainment]
"A person is guilty of evading detainment when:

- He leaves and/or resets, or glitch to avoid detainment combative or intelligence personnel; especially when detained by a member of the O5-Council.

SECTION 7 - GENERAL CHANGES & UPDATES

CLAUSE 7.1. The appeals system for Class-E sentences (regardless of duration) shall be transferred to a separate Trello board headed and maintained by the Ethics Committee.
CLAUSE 7.2. The appeals system for site moderation (regardless of form of moderation and issuer) shall be transferred to a separate Trello board headed and maintained by the Ethics Committee.
CLAUSE 7.3. The Ethics Committee retains the authority to appeal site moderation actions as well as Class-E sentences with just reasoning and in accordance with established department guidelines.
CLAUSE 7.4. All cards in the form of a disciplinary measure (Class-E request) shall abide by this format for the title of the card at all times, for records sake;

User ID: Username

Example: "18352871: Regaunde"

CLAUSE 7.4.1 All cards in the form of a disciplinary measure (Class-E request) shall abide by this format for the Description of the card at all times, for records sake;

Name:
User ID:
Level:
Date:
Charges:
Narrative:
Evidence:
Witnesses:
Duration of sentence:

CLAUSE 7.4.2 The "Class-E Requests Format" card on the Class E logs board (linked below) shall be updated to reflect the aforementioned template in Clause 7.4 and 7.4.1.

---

+ Show Foundation Legislations

> Criminal Sentencing Legislation

---

Following the introduction and implementation of the Criminal Sentencing Legislation, all Foundation personnel will be mandated to review and comply to it.
ANY future motions/proposals/legislation that are in-regards or relates to any subject or topic of: "Class-E Minimums", DST Sentencing, Class-E sentencing, Class-E standards, requesting and approving a Class-E sentence, emergency Class-E requirements and standards, permanent Class-E requirements and standards, legal and improper prosecutions, Entrapment, Double Jeopardy or, Malicious Prosecution, will be amended as an addition to the Criminal Sentencing Legislation.
-
The Criminal Sentencing Legislation consists a series of sections and regulations pertaining to the Class-E sentencing system and DST sentencing system; and a foundation of what personnel can and can not be charged for.
CSL

---

> Penal Code Legislation

---

Following the introduction and implementation of the Penal Code, all Foundation personnel will be mandated to review and comply to it.

---

The Penal Code consists a series of criminal offenses that Foundation personnel can be prosecuted and charged for, resulting in a possible Class-E sentence for an indefinite amount of time depending on the severity of the offense committed.
Penal Code

---

> Foundation Moderation Legislation

---

The Foundation Moderation Legislation ensures that moderation on-site and on the Foundation Discord server is regulated on a Foundation-wide scale as well as having all regulations pertaining to moderation in a central place for all to see. The following legislation aims to ensure that an official and proper moderation pipeline is established for moderation on Foundation sites as well as in the Discord server. This legislation also has the goal of ensuring that all individuals, regardless of rank, are held to the same exact standard and are required to follow the same exact rules with the same consequences for failing to follow said regulations. Those with admin commands are required to follow this legislation, regardless of the rank they hold.

---

SECTION 1 - In-Game Moderation:

SUBSECTION 1 - Moderation Pipeline

CLAUSE 1.1.1. The Executive Guide on Moderation shall display the moderation pipeline for all current offenses moderation action may be taken against. The Guide shall be maintained in a joint effort between the O5 Council and Site Directors.
CLAUSE 1.1.2. The moderation pipeline within the Executive Guide on Moderation is required to be followed at all times, by all personnel with access to admin commands. Failure to follow the pipeline can result in disciplinary action, such as a suspension.
CLAUSE 1.1.3. The Executive Guide on Moderation will be managed by the Site Directors and O5 Council.
CLAUSE 1.1.4. Bans and Permanent Bans are required to have proper evidence attached and submitted/logged within 24 hours of said moderation occurring.

SUBSECTION 2 - Violations

CLAUSE 1.2.1. Failure to attach evidence to or failure to log Bans and Permanent Bans can lead to disciplinary action. Evidence is included but not limited to screenshots, videos, gifs, and chatlogs.
CLAUSE 1.2.2. If moderation action is taken against an individual and it does not follow this legislation, an appeal is to be submitted to the Ethics Committee for review. If found that the ban was in violation of this legislation and the appeal is granted, the case is to be forwarded to the Inspector Generals for review.
CLAUSE 1.2.3. The Inspector Generals shall be the main body tasked with looking into cases of misuse of admin, as outlined in this Legislation, and taking action against the Executive(s) violating this Legislation.

---

> Punishment & Disciplinary Action Documentation

---

Following the introduction and implementation of the Punishment & Disciplinary Action Documentation, all Foundation personnel will be mandated to review and comply to it.
ANY future motions/proposals/legislation that are in-regards or relates to any subject or topic of: "disciplinary action", "disciplinary action notification", restriction of specific disciplinary action in certain departments, exemptions from disciplinary actions, "official negligence", department personnel negligence, or, improper or illegal assignment of disciplinary action, will be amended as an addition to the Punishment & Disciplinary Action Documentation.
-
The Punishment & Disciplinary Action Documentation is in regards to the inappropriate use of disciplinary action against Foundation personnel as punishment along with listing a series of regulations to ensure and check the justification of any disciplinary action assigned to personnel; and how these actions can be used to punish offenders or personnel found of official misconduct or negligence.
P&DA

---

> RSM Documentation

---

Following the introduction and implementation of the RSM Documentation, all Foundation personnel, especially executive personnel, will be mandated to review and comply to it.
ANY future motions/proposals/legislation that are in-regards or relates to any subject or topic of: "RSM", duties and responsibilities of executives, clearance promotions, or, clearance demotions, will be amended as an addition to the RSM Documentation.

---

The RSM Documentation explains the Foundation personnel hierarchy system thoroughly and lays a foundation of principles the executive base must withhold and comply to. The RSM Documentation also elucidates the background of the RSM and how it's system works.
RSM

---

> The Legislative Process

---

write the stuff xD lawl

> Site Regulations

The Foundation has multiple places under its care. These places, known as sites, are dangerous. Without the proper regulations, there would be nothing but chaos on these sites. Site Regulations exist to control what can and can't be done on Foundation sites.
‣ Site Regulations

---

> Code of Ethics (CoE) & Code of Security (CoS)

The Code of Ethics are a list of rules that all personnel, no matter their rank, must follow. Written and updated by the Ethics Committee, it exists to ensure that the Foundation remains somewhat ethical.
‣ Code of Ethics
⠀
The Code of Security is a list of rules pertaining to combative and security aspects of the SCP Foundation at Foundation controlled facilities.
‣ Code of Security

---

> Rank Structure

The Rank Structure dictates which clearance a person should receive depending on the rank that they occupy within a department. Someone that isn't in a department but has passed the standard application will receive a Level-0 clearance.
‣ Rank Structure

---

> Class-E Logs & Foundation Blacklist

Class-E's are suspended personnel within the Foundation. Should someone be confirmed to have broken a rule, they will most likely face a Class-E sentence. To learn more about appeals, the Class-E system or who is currently Class-E'd, see the link below.
‣ Class-E Logs
⠀
The Foundation Blacklist board logs and tracks every single individual or group that are banned from ever joining the group.
‣ Foundation Blacklist

---